1965 Humber Sceptre vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Humber Sceptre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Humber Sceptre would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 68 more horse power than 1965 Humber Sceptre. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1965 Humber Sceptre.
Because 1965 Humber Sceptre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Humber Sceptre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Humber Sceptre. (144 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Humber Sceptre.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Humber Sceptre | 2011 Holden Epica | |
Make | Humber | Holden |
Model | Sceptre | Epica |
Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1725 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 144 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2700 mm |