1965 Pontiac Tempest vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 3,522 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Pontiac Tempest (118 HP) has 39 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Because 1965 Pontiac Tempest is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Pontiac Tempest. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Pontiac Tempest | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Pontiac | Nissan |
Model | Tempest | Micra |
Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3522 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 79 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1666 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2449 mm |