1965 Triumph Spitfire vs. 2012 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC60 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 2,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 1196 kg more than 1965 Triumph Spitfire.
Because 2012 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Triumph Spitfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Triumph Spitfire | 2012 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Triumph | Volvo |
| Model | Spitfire | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1147 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 725 kg | 1921 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1712 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2748 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 70 L |
