1966 Audi Variant vs. 2000 Chevrolet Triax
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Triax is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Audi Variant would be higher. At 1,696 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Audi Variant is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Triax weights approximately 528 kg more than 1966 Audi Variant.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Audi Variant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Audi Variant | 2000 Chevrolet Triax | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | Variant | Triax |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1696 cc | 660 cc |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1598 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2790 mm |
