1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2001 Daihatsu Naked
To start off, 2001 Daihatsu Naked is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite weights approximately 370 kg more than 2001 Daihatsu Naked.
Because 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daihatsu Naked, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2001 Daihatsu Naked | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Daihatsu |
Model | Sprite | Naked |
Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 63 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 37 L |