1966 BMW 2000 vs. 2008 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 756 kg more than 1966 BMW 2000.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 BMW 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 BMW 2000 | 2008 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | 2000 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 202 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2950 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 82 L |
