1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2003 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2003 Renault Kangoo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 134 more horse power than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Kangoo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1010 kg more than 2003 Renault Kangoo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Cadillac DeVille | 2003 Renault Kangoo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Renault |
| Model | DeVille | Kangoo |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Panel Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 74 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2045 kg | 1035 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2620 mm |
