1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2009 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2009 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,768 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Cherokee (175 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1495 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen 2CV | 2009 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Citroen | Jeep |
Model | 2CV | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 2768 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 2055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 70 L |