1966 DKW Munga vs. 1979 Chrysler 1609
To start off, 1979 Chrysler 1609 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,811 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Chrysler 1609 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Chrysler 1609 (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Chrysler 1609 should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 DKW Munga weights approximately 10 kg more than 1979 Chrysler 1609.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Chrysler 1609. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DKW Munga | 1979 Chrysler 1609 | |
Make | DKW | Chrysler |
Model | Munga | 1609 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 978 cc | 1811 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2670 mm |