1966 Ford 12 M vs. 1995 Mazda Midge

To start off, 1995 Mazda Midge is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,699 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford 12 M (70 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1995 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford 12 M should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda Midge weights approximately 71 kg more than 1966 Ford 12 M.

Because 1966 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Ford 12 M (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1966 Ford 12 M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda Midge.

Compare all specifications: