1966 Ford Corsair vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Corsair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Corsair would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1966 Ford Corsair. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Corsair. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1035 kg more than 1966 Ford Corsair. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 281 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Corsair. (101 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Corsair.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Ford Corsair | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Corsair | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 101 Nm | 382 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 885 kg | 1920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 87 L |
