1966 Holden HD vs. 2009 Volkswagen CC
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen CC is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen CC (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen CC should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD.
Because 1966 Holden HD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden HD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen CC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volkswagen CC. (207 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volkswagen CC.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 2009 Volkswagen CC | |
Make | Holden | Volkswagen |
Model | HD | CC |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1860 mm |