1967 Austin A 60 vs. 2005 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2005 Nissan Almera is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Almera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Almera (113 HP) has 53 more horse power than 1967 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Almera should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Almera weights approximately 250 kg more than 1967 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Almera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Almera (163 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Almera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin A 60 | 2005 Nissan Almera | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 60 | Almera |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1770 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 113 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 60 L |