1967 Autobianchi Primula vs. 2005 Ford Puma
To start off, 2005 Ford Puma is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Autobianchi Primula. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Autobianchi Primula would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Puma (100 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1967 Autobianchi Primula. (57 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1967 Autobianchi Primula. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Puma weights approximately 205 kg more than 1967 Autobianchi Primula. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Autobianchi Primula | 2005 Ford Puma | |
Make | Autobianchi | Ford |
Model | Primula | Puma |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1221 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 45 L |