1967 Dodge Monaco vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Dodge Monaco. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Dodge Monaco would be higher. At 6,292 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Dodge Monaco is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Dodge Monaco (270 HP) has 161 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Dodge Monaco should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1967 Dodge Monaco is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Dodge Monaco. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Dodge Monaco | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Monaco | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6292 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 109 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2490 mm |