1967 Dodge Monaco vs. 2003 Jaguar R-D6

To start off, 2003 Jaguar R-D6 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Dodge Monaco. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Dodge Monaco would be higher. At 6,292 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Dodge Monaco is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Dodge Monaco (270 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2003 Jaguar R-D6. (230 HP @ 6150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Dodge Monaco should accelerate faster than 2003 Jaguar R-D6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Dodge Monaco weights approximately 364 kg more than 2003 Jaguar R-D6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Dodge Monaco (529 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Jaguar R-D6. (500 Nm). This means 1967 Dodge Monaco will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Jaguar R-D6.

Compare all specifications:

1967 Dodge Monaco 2003 Jaguar R-D6
Make Dodge Jaguar
Model Monaco R-D6
Year Released 1967 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6292 cc 2720 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 270 HP 230 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6150 RPM
Torque 529 Nm 500 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1864 kg 1500 kg
Vehicle Length 5590 mm 4340 mm
Vehicle Width 2020 mm 2160 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 3110 mm 2720 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 83 L 69 L