1968 Dodge Coronet vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Dodge Coronet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Dodge Coronet would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Dodge Coronet is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Dodge Coronet weights approximately 116 kg more than 2010 Toyota Matrix.
Because 1968 Dodge Coronet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Dodge Coronet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Dodge Coronet | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Coronet | Matrix |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7206 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1424 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4394 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2601 mm |