1969 AMC AMX vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 AMC AMX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 AMC AMX would be higher. At 6,384 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 AMC AMX (340 HP) has 187 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 AMC AMX should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Because 1969 AMC AMX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 AMC AMX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 AMC AMX (583 Nm) has 346 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 1969 AMC AMX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
1969 AMC AMX | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | AMC | Holden |
Model | AMX | Epica |
Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6384 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 583 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |