1969 Audi Variant vs. 2004 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Audi Variant would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1969 Audi Variant. (53 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1969 Audi Variant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ranger weights approximately 572 kg more than 1969 Audi Variant. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Audi Variant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Ranger (251 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Audi Variant. (113 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Audi Variant | 2004 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | Variant | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1696 cc | 2983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 113 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1642 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 74 L |
