1969 Austin Maxi vs. 1982 Skoda Rapid R
To start off, 1982 Skoda Rapid R is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Austin Maxi is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Austin Maxi weights approximately 137 kg more than 1982 Skoda Rapid R.
Because 1982 Skoda Rapid R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Skoda Rapid R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Maxi | 1982 Skoda Rapid R | |
Make | Austin | Skoda |
Model | Maxi | Rapid R |
Year Released | 1969 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 62 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 987 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 47 L |