1970 AMC AMX III vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 AMC AMX III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 AMC AMX III would be higher. At 6,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 AMC AMX III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 AMC AMX III (341 HP) has 193 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 AMC AMX III should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Because 1970 AMC AMX III is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 AMC AMX III. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 AMC AMX III | 2012 Holden Epica | |
| Make | AMC | Holden |
| Model | AMX III | Epica |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6375 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 341 HP | 148 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2700 mm |
