1970 Audi Super 90 vs. 2006 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2006 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Audi Super 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Audi Super 90 would be higher. At 2,425 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Wrangler (147 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1970 Audi Super 90. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1970 Audi Super 90.
Because 2006 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Audi Super 90. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Wrangler (224 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Audi Super 90. (149 Nm). This means 2006 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Audi Super 90.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Audi Super 90 | 2006 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Audi | Jeep |
| Model | Super 90 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1759 cc | 2425 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 147 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 149 Nm | 224 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.5 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.3 mm | 101 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2380 mm |
