1971 Audi 100 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Audi 100 would be higher. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (542 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 463 more horse power than 1971 Audi 100. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1971 Audi 100.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (550 Nm @ 6200 RPM) has 414 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Audi 100. (136 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Audi 100 | 2009 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 100 | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1971 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1760 cc | 6162 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 542 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 136 Nm | 550 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2890 mm |