1972 Alpine A 310 vs. 1996 Mercury Villager
To start off, 1996 Mercury Villager is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Alpine A 310. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Alpine A 310 would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1972 Alpine A 310. (124 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 1972 Alpine A 310. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Villager weights approximately 975 kg more than 1972 Alpine A 310. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Alpine A 310 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Alpine A 310. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Alpine A 310 | 1996 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Alpine | Mercury |
Model | A 310 | Villager |
Year Released | 1972 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1605 cc | 2960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2860 mm |