1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1947 Riley RM A
To start off, 1972 Austin 2200 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Riley RM A weights approximately 54 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin 2200 | 1947 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Austin | Riley |
| Model | 2200 | RM A |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1947 |
| Engine Size | 2227 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2870 mm |
