1972 Matra-Simca M670 vs. 2000 Volvo V40
To start off, 2000 Volvo V40 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Matra-Simca M670. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Matra-Simca M670 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (12 cylinders), 1972 Matra-Simca M670 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Matra-Simca M670 (444 HP @ 11000 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 2000 Volvo V40. (197 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Matra-Simca M670 should accelerate faster than 2000 Volvo V40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volvo V40 weights approximately 715 kg more than 1972 Matra-Simca M670.
Because 1972 Matra-Simca M670 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Matra-Simca M670. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volvo V40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Matra-Simca M670 | 2000 Volvo V40 | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Volvo |
| Model | M670 | V40 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 2999 cc | 1948 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 11000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1395 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2650 mm |
