1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,981 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler 160. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Because 1973 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler 160 (163 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Cruze. (148 Nm). This means 1973 Chrysler 160 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler 160 | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | 160 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1973 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1981 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 163 Nm | 148 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2685 mm |