1974 Citroen SM vs. 1962 Zastava 750

To start off, 1974 Citroen SM is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 2,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Citroen SM (170 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1962 Zastava 750. (24 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 1962 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Citroen SM weights approximately 845 kg more than 1962 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Citroen SM (237 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Zastava 750. (46 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1974 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Zastava 750.

Compare all specifications: