1975 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2003 Honda Integra
To start off, 2003 Honda Integra is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Honda Integra is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1975 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Mazda Cosmo | 2003 Honda Integra | |
Make | Mazda | Honda |
Model | Cosmo | Integra |
Year Released | 1975 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4374 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1725 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 50 L |