1976 BMW 630 vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 BMW 630. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 BMW 630 would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 BMW 630 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 BMW 630 (182 HP) has 112 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1976 BMW 630 should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 BMW 630 weights approximately 711 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 BMW 630 (255 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1976 BMW 630 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
1976 BMW 630 | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | BMW | MCC |
Model | 630 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1976 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 255 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1451 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 1810 mm |