1978 BMW 320 vs. 1996 Kia Avella
To start off, 1996 Kia Avella is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 BMW 320 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 BMW 320 (641 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 554 more horse power than 1996 Kia Avella. (87 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1996 Kia Avella. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Kia Avella weights approximately 105 kg more than 1978 BMW 320.
Because 1978 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Kia Avella, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 BMW 320 | 1996 Kia Avella | |
Make | BMW | Kia |
Model | 320 | Avella |
Year Released | 1978 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 641 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 9000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2400 mm |