1978 Chevrolet Astrovette vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chevrolet Astrovette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chevrolet Astrovette would be higher.
Because 1978 Chevrolet Astrovette is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Chevrolet Astrovette. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chevrolet Astrovette | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Astrovette | 6 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |