1979 Audi 100 vs. 1968 Mazda Cosmo

To start off, 1979 Audi 100 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (94 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1979 Audi 100. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1979 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Audi 100 weights approximately 170 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.

Because 1968 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Audi 100. (124 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1968 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Audi 100.

Compare all specifications:

1979 Audi 100 1968 Mazda Cosmo
Make Audi Mazda
Model 100 Cosmo
Year Released 1979 1968
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1588 cc 1964 cc
Engine Type in-line dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 85 HP 94 HP
Torque 124 Nm 133 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1110 kg 940 kg
Vehicle Length 4600 mm 4150 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1600 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1170 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2210 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 57 L