1979 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2008 Volvo C30
To start off, 2008 Volvo C30 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 544 kg more than 2008 Volvo C30.
Because 1979 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Cadillac Brougham | 2008 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | Brougham | C30 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5032 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1406 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2650 mm |