1979 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1978 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1979 Chrysler 1609 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1978 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda RX-7 (105 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1979 Chrysler 1609. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1979 Chrysler 1609. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Chrysler 1609 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1978 Mazda RX-7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Mazda RX-7 (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Chrysler 1609. (144 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1978 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Chrysler 1609.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chrysler 1609 | 1978 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | 1609 | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1979 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1811 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2430 mm |