1979 Citroen CX vs. 2013 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-Z is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Citroen CX would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Honda CR-Z (120 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1979 Citroen CX. (107 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 1979 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Citroen CX weights approximately 39 kg more than 2013 Honda CR-Z.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Honda CR-Z (174 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Citroen CX. (167 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2013 Honda CR-Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Citroen CX | 2013 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | Citroen | Honda |
Model | CX | CR-Z |
Year Released | 1979 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.9 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 89 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1196 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4079 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2435 mm |