1979 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2012 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2012 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1979 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volkswagen Eos (138 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1979 Mazda RX-7. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volkswagen Eos should accelerate faster than 1979 Mazda RX-7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volkswagen Eos weights approximately 532 kg more than 1979 Mazda RX-7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volkswagen Eos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volkswagen Eos (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Mazda RX-7. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Volkswagen Eos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Mazda RX-7. 2012 Volkswagen Eos has automatic transmission and 1979 Mazda RX-7 has manual transmission. 1979 Mazda RX-7 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volkswagen Eos will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Mazda RX-7 | 2012 Volkswagen Eos | |
Make | Mazda | Volkswagen |
Model | RX-7 | Eos |
Year Released | 1979 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automated manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1592 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4423 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1791 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1444 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2578 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 55 L |