1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 219 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Because 2010 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (350 Nm) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | Mini Metro | UTE |
Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 281 HP |
Torque | 97 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |