1980 Mazda 323 vs. 1979 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 1980 Mazda 323 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,415 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Seat Ritmo weights approximately 5 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323.
Because 1980 Mazda 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Seat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mazda 323 | 1979 Seat Ritmo | |
| Make | Mazda | Seat |
| Model | 323 | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1415 cc | 1197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 63 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2460 mm |
