1980 Triumph TR7 vs. 2011 Lincoln MKZ
To start off, 2011 Lincoln MKZ is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Triumph TR7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Triumph TR7 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Lincoln MKZ is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1980 Triumph TR7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Triumph TR7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Lincoln MKZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Triumph TR7 | 2011 Lincoln MKZ | |
| Make | Triumph | Lincoln |
| Model | TR7 | MKZ |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4821 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1834 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1443 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2728 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 66 L |
