1982 Austin Allegro vs. 1986 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1986 Ford Ranger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Austin Allegro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1986 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1982 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1982 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 1986 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Allegro | Ranger |
Year Released | 1982 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1770 mm |