1982 Austin Allegro vs. 2009 Cadillac XLR
To start off, 2009 Cadillac XLR is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 4,369 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac XLR (444 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 400 more horse power than 1982 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 921 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Cadillac XLR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac XLR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac XLR (561 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 491 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Allegro. 2009 Cadillac XLR has automatic transmission and 1982 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1982 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac XLR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 2009 Cadillac XLR | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Allegro | XLR |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 4369 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 444 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 561 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1721 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2690 mm |