1982 Austin Marina vs. 1967 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1982 Austin Marina is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Mustang (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1982 Austin Marina. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Marina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Mustang weights approximately 283 kg more than 1982 Austin Marina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Marina | 1967 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Marina | Mustang |
Year Released | 1982 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 4733 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 882 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2750 mm |