1982 Bitter SC vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bitter SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bitter SC would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Bitter SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Bitter SC (177 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (150 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Bitter SC should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 1982 Bitter SC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Bitter SC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Bitter SC (248 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1982 Bitter SC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bitter SC | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Bitter | Mazda |
Model | SC | 3 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 248 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2650 mm |