1982 BMW 323 vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 323 would be higher. At 2,493 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 BMW 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 BMW 323 weights approximately 190 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 1982 BMW 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 BMW 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 BMW 323 | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 323 | 3 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2493 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1310 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2650 mm |