1982 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 2009 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2009 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 293 kg more than 1982 Bristol Beaufighter.
Because 2009 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Bristol Beaufighter. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Bristol Beaufighter has automatic transmission and 2009 Jeep Wrangler has manual transmission. 2009 Jeep Wrangler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Bristol Beaufighter will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bristol Beaufighter | 2009 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Bristol | Jeep |
Model | Beaufighter | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 3778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 202 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 2043 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2950 mm |