1982 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2010 Volkswagen Citi
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Citi is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 240 kg more than 2010 Volkswagen Citi.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Citi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Chevrolet Impala has automatic transmission and 2010 Volkswagen Citi has manual transmission. 2010 Volkswagen Citi will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Chevrolet Impala will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Impala | 2010 Volkswagen Citi | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volkswagen |
Model | Impala | Citi |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1423 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 83 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5460 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2410 mm |