1982 Chrysler E vs. 2006 Volvo S60
To start off, 2006 Volvo S60 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo S60 (207 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo S60 weights approximately 289 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo S60 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2006 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | E | S60 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1534 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2720 mm |