1982 Citroen LN vs. 2003 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Citroen LN. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Citroen LN would be higher. At 652 cc (2 cylinders), 1982 Citroen LN is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1982 Citroen LN. (35 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1982 Citroen LN. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 26 kg more than 1982 Citroen LN. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Citroen LN, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Citroen LN. (50 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Citroen LN.

Compare all specifications: