1982 Fiat 127 vs. 1960 Ford Taunus
To start off, 1982 Fiat 127 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Ford Taunus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Ford Taunus (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1982 Fiat 127. (44 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Ford Taunus should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat 127. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Ford Taunus weights approximately 256 kg more than 1982 Fiat 127. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Fiat 127, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Ford Taunus (111 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat 127. (64 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1960 Ford Taunus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat 127.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Fiat 127 | 1960 Ford Taunus | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 127 | Taunus |
Year Released | 1982 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 903 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 64 Nm | 111 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 7.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3720 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2640 mm |